Exegesis and History: A Comparison of the Concepts of History in Rudolf Bultmann’s and Oscar Cullmann's Exegesis of Matthew 16:17-19, Romans 5:12-21, And John 3:9-21

Author

Stephen Carter

Date of Award

5-1-1967

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Sacred Theology (STM)

Department

Systematic Theology

First Advisor

Robert Bertram

Scripture References in this Resource

Matthew 16:17-19; Romans 5:12-21; John 3:9-21; Mark 8:27-33; Mark 10:17; 32; Mark 9:33-34; Luke 5:1-11; John 21:15-19; John 1:42; Matthew 16:13-15; John 20:22-23; Matthew 18:15-17; Mark 16:17-19; Romans 3:21-31; Romans 4:1-24; Romans 6:1-7:6; Romans 7:7-25; Romans 8:1-11

Abstract

This paper offers a case study of two modern exegetes who use the historical-critical method, Rudolf Bultmann and Oscar Cullmann. An introductory statement of their methodology will serve to emphasize their similarities and their differences.

Recommended Citation

Carter, Stephen, "Exegesis and History: A Comparison of the Concepts of History in Rudolf Bultmann’s and Oscar Cullmann's Exegesis of Matthew 16:17-19, Romans 5:12-21, And John 3:9-21" (1967). Master of Sacred Theology Thesis. 320.
https://scholar.csl.edu/stm/320

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.