Date of Award

5-16-2025

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department

Systematic Theology

First Advisor

Joel Okamoto

Scripture References in this Resource

Genesis 1-3; Romans 8; 1 Corinthians 2:16; Philippians 1:27; 1 Corinthians 1:10

Abstract

This dissertation argues that Christian theology and practice are aided and enriched by a more complete understanding of reason by surveying recent studies and views in theology, philosophy, cognitive psychology, and cognitive linguistics. Since the Enlightenment, Christian theology has assumed widely the Enlightenment model of human reason as ideally acontextual, that is, free from constraints of contexts, and therefore universal, that is, applicable in all contexts. Recent developments from a variety of perspectives challenge this model of rationality. Some challenge the acontextualism of the Enlightenment understanding by showing how it arose from and depends on a context, and that context is always a feature of being rational. Others call into question the assumed anthropology of Enlightenment rationality. They show that reason is situated and guided according to desires, biases, intuitions, and metaphors. This dissertation surveys and summarizes a variety of these developments, analyzes their theological implications, assesses their impact for selected Christian practices, and illustrates their value with specific recommendations for thinking about and evaluating these selected Christian practices.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Share

COinS