Date of Award

4-15-1936

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Bachelor of Divinity (B.Div)

Department

Exegetical Theology

First Advisor

William Arndt

Scripture References in this Resource (separated by semi-colons)

John 1:9; 2 Peter 3:2; John 3:16; John 5:43; John 6:3; Luke 18:33; Matthew 2:1; Luke 1:5; Mark 1:24; Galatians 6:10; John 6:69; Romans 5:7; 1 Peter 4:18; James 2:6; James 1:3; 1 Peter 1:7; Matthew 13:48; Hebrews 7:7; Acts 26:7; Matthew 5:45; Luke 15:4; Titus 3:8; Luke 1:35; Luke 19:10; Philippians 3:8; Romans 2:18; Matthew 15:4; Luke 17:17; Matthew 13:3; Matthew 5:32; Revelation 1:4; Galatians 1:17;

Abstract

Since the turn of the century the conceptions of New Testament language have undergone a radical change. Until this time "Biblical" Greek was essentially an isolated language. Two extremes had been followed in the appraisal of the New Testament Greek. On the one hand, the Purist insisted on finding parallels for all constructions in classical Greek. This was an impossible task. On the other hand, we had the Hebraist who found Semitic influence where there was none. Two separate groups of evidence have entered to break down these false conceptions. These are the papyri and the inscriptions of the age.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Share

COinS