Concordia Theological Monthly
Publication Date
9-1-1970
Document Type
Article
Keywords
st. mark, st. matthew, gospel, st. luke, styler, sic et non, streeter, isaiah
Submission Type
Bible Study; Lecture; Sermon Prep
Abstract
Let’s take another look at the view that Matthew depends on Mark, especially at the way in which G. M. Styler has recently defended it. The author then examines the pros and cons of the arguments and concludes that the case for Markan priority is not as open and shut as some would argue.
Disciplines
Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion
Scripture References in this Resource (separated by semi-colons)
Mark 2:15; Mark 8:24; Mark 4:11; Luke 8:10; Matthew 13:13-15; Mark 3:13; Mark 3:13; Mark 3:7; Mark 3:20; Mark 14:1; Matthew 9:35;
Submission Cost
Free
Submission Audience
Laity; Ministers; Scholars
Recommended Citation
Hamann, H. P.
(1970)
"Sic et Non: Are We So Sure of Matthean Dependence on Mark?,"
Concordia Theological Monthly: Vol. 41, Article 47.
Available at:
https://scholar.csl.edu/ctm/vol41/iss1/47
