Concordia Theological Monthly
Publication Date
3-1-1967
Document Type
Article
Keywords
messianic prophecy, interpretation, new testament, israel, solomon, stoeckhardt, missouri synod
Submission Type
Bible Study; Lecture; Sermon Prep
Abstract
The purpose of this article is not to argue directly for the correctness of the one or the other interpretation, though the writer's preference will, no doubt, become clear; rather it is to give a historical survey of the exegetical literature of the two synods dealing with Messianic prophecy and to show how these two contrasting approaches were held by men who were in church fellowship with each other in The Evangelical Lutheran Synodical Conference of North America, all the while disagreeing with one another on this issue. By presenting the argumentation of both sides of the problem, this study may be of some assistance in achieving clarity on the issues involved.
Disciplines
Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion
Submission Cost
Free
Submission Audience
Laity; Ministers; Scholars
Recommended Citation
Hassold, William J.
(1967)
"Rectilinear or Typological Interpretation of Messianic Prophecy?,"
Concordia Theological Monthly: Vol. 38, Article 19.
Available at:
https://scholar.csl.edu/ctm/vol38/iss1/19
