Concordia Theological Monthly
Article Title
Publication Date
9-1-1932
Document Type
Article
Keywords
divine, human, natures, christian, incarnation, nestorius, doctrine, lutheran, theology
Submission Type
Bible Study; Lecture; Sermon Prep
Abstract
The incarnation of the Son of God for the salvation of the world is the central truth of the Gospel, and since the Church of the living God is the "pillar and ground of the truth," it has the duty to maintain this truth, to defend it against the assaults of error, and to transmit it to future generations. This we must keep in mind when considering the two natures in Christ; for at first we, too, might be inclined to agree with Hodge when he says: "Not content with admitting the fact that the two natures are united in one person, the Lutheran theologians insist on explaining that fact. They are willing to acknowledge that two natures, or substances, soul and body, are united in the one person in man without pretending to explain the essential nature of the union. Why, then, can they not receive the fact that the two natures are united in Christ without philosophizing about it? The first objection therefore is that the Lutheran doctrine is an attempt to explain the inscrutable."
Disciplines
Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion
Scripture References in this Resource (separated by semi-colons)
1 John 4:2-3; John 1:14; Romans 5:10;
Submission Cost
Free
Submission Audience
Laity; Ministers; Scholars
Recommended Citation
Dierks, Theo.
(1932)
"Rejection of Eutychianism and Nestorianism in the "Genus Apotelesmaticum" and a Short Review of Reformed Christology,"
Concordia Theological Monthly: Vol. 3, Article 89.
Available at:
https://scholar.csl.edu/ctm/vol3/iss1/89