1 00:00:08,490 --> 00:00:09,193 Alright, so, 2 00:00:09,193 --> 00:00:10,577 far I've given you an 3 00:00:10,577 --> 00:00:11,658 introduction of practical 4 00:00:11,658 --> 00:00:13,193 theological framework. 5 00:00:13,193 --> 00:00:15,522 We talked about the exploratory 6 00:00:15,522 --> 00:00:17,297 tool of attending to self in the 7 00:00:17,297 --> 00:00:18,929 world. And in this video, 8 00:00:18,929 --> 00:00:20,337 we're going to talk about the 9 00:00:20,337 --> 00:00:22,561 exploratory tool then of 10 00:00:22,561 --> 00:00:24,386 engaging in first article 11 00:00:24,386 --> 00:00:25,546 insights. 12 00:00:25,546 --> 00:00:26,953 And when we engage in first 13 00:00:26,953 --> 00:00:27,842 article insights, 14 00:00:27,842 --> 00:00:28,552 we're going to be asking 15 00:00:28,552 --> 00:00:30,421 ourselves the question what is 16 00:00:30,421 --> 00:00:33,050 is God's design for creation? 17 00:00:33,050 --> 00:00:34,578 Some tools that will be helpful 18 00:00:34,578 --> 00:00:37,641 to do this is having some skills 19 00:00:37,641 --> 00:00:39,873 to use the library an 20 00:00:39,873 --> 00:00:41,522 investigative attitude. 21 00:00:41,522 --> 00:00:43,378 It's kind of like an exploratory 22 00:00:43,378 --> 00:00:44,242 attitude, 23 00:00:44,242 --> 00:00:45,665 but we're actually going to do 24 00:00:45,665 --> 00:00:47,069 investigating of things. 25 00:00:47,069 --> 00:00:48,382 We're going to look more deeper 26 00:00:48,382 --> 00:00:50,109 into it than maybe 27 00:00:50,109 --> 00:00:51,190 just exploring. 28 00:00:51,190 --> 00:00:52,477 We're going to investigate it in 29 00:00:52,477 --> 00:00:53,701 a certain way that's going to 30 00:00:53,701 --> 00:00:55,516 give us more data and 31 00:00:55,516 --> 00:00:56,435 more information. 32 00:00:56,435 --> 00:00:58,504 Critical thinking skills and 33 00:00:58,504 --> 00:00:59,721 scientific merit will 34 00:00:59,721 --> 00:01:00,498 be helpful. 35 00:01:00,498 --> 00:01:02,986 The components of this is we're 36 00:01:02,986 --> 00:01:04,458 going to identify and analyze 37 00:01:04,458 --> 00:01:05,969 literature that attends to 38 00:01:05,969 --> 00:01:07,288 the issue or opportunity 39 00:01:07,288 --> 00:01:08,469 and the ministry question 40 00:01:08,469 --> 00:01:09,582 that you've created. 41 00:01:09,582 --> 00:01:10,949 We're going to distinguish from 42 00:01:10,949 --> 00:01:12,838 science and pseudoscience. 43 00:01:12,838 --> 00:01:14,652 We're going to identify and 44 00:01:14,652 --> 00:01:16,197 analyze various maps of 45 00:01:16,197 --> 00:01:17,957 understanding about the 46 00:01:17,957 --> 00:01:18,893 literature or first 47 00:01:18,893 --> 00:01:20,205 article things. 48 00:01:20,205 --> 00:01:22,433 We're going to acknowledge and 49 00:01:22,433 --> 00:01:23,953 identify the limitations of 50 00:01:23,953 --> 00:01:25,626 first article insights. 51 00:01:25,626 --> 00:01:26,993 And we're going to determine how 52 00:01:26,993 --> 00:01:28,673 first article insights can 53 00:01:28,673 --> 00:01:30,041 actually contribute to us 54 00:01:30,041 --> 00:01:31,336 addressing that issue and 55 00:01:31,336 --> 00:01:33,741 opportunity and also answering 56 00:01:33,741 --> 00:01:35,092 the ministry question that you 57 00:01:35,092 --> 00:01:37,741 have established. Alright, 58 00:01:37,741 --> 00:01:40,261 so let's get into it then. 59 00:01:40,261 --> 00:01:41,940 We're going to first of all 60 00:01:43,590 --> 00:01:45,753 realize that when we're looking 61 00:01:45,753 --> 00:01:48,265 at first article insights, 62 00:01:48,265 --> 00:01:50,218 we are looking at the creation. 63 00:01:50,218 --> 00:01:51,401 So the first article of the 64 00:01:51,401 --> 00:01:53,465 creed talks about how God 65 00:01:53,465 --> 00:01:56,425 created everything, alright? 66 00:01:56,425 --> 00:01:59,598 So when scientists are exploring 67 00:01:59,598 --> 00:02:00,812 and investigating and 68 00:02:00,812 --> 00:02:02,245 doing research, 69 00:02:02,245 --> 00:02:04,614 they are doing it upon 70 00:02:04,614 --> 00:02:05,910 God's creation. 71 00:02:05,910 --> 00:02:07,797 And we acknowledge that this is 72 00:02:07,797 --> 00:02:09,908 all God's creation, alright. 73 00:02:09,908 --> 00:02:12,006 So when we look at psychology, 74 00:02:12,006 --> 00:02:13,562 history, social economics, 75 00:02:13,562 --> 00:02:14,258 or the political, 76 00:02:14,258 --> 00:02:15,985 if we use one of these ways 77 00:02:15,985 --> 00:02:17,777 to look at our issue 78 00:02:17,777 --> 00:02:18,985 or opportunity, 79 00:02:18,985 --> 00:02:21,170 we're looking at what secular 80 00:02:21,170 --> 00:02:23,081 society is saying about it, 81 00:02:23,081 --> 00:02:24,258 what they've discovered 82 00:02:24,258 --> 00:02:25,385 about it, 83 00:02:25,385 --> 00:02:26,522 what their thoughts 84 00:02:26,522 --> 00:02:27,209 are about it, 85 00:02:27,209 --> 00:02:28,202 conclusions that they've 86 00:02:28,202 --> 00:02:29,192 made about it. 87 00:02:29,192 --> 00:02:30,728 That doesn't necessarily mean 88 00:02:30,728 --> 00:02:32,561 we have to agree with them, 89 00:02:32,561 --> 00:02:33,353 alright. 90 00:02:33,353 --> 00:02:34,978 Because as they're exploring 91 00:02:34,978 --> 00:02:35,874 the creation, 92 00:02:35,874 --> 00:02:38,449 they themselves often find that 93 00:02:38,449 --> 00:02:40,497 sometimes they're wrong. 94 00:02:40,497 --> 00:02:41,057 In fact, 95 00:02:41,057 --> 00:02:42,825 it doesn't take very much to see 96 00:02:42,825 --> 00:02:45,442 how sometimes science scientists 97 00:02:45,442 --> 00:02:47,385 don't always get it right. 98 00:02:47,385 --> 00:02:49,826 So the world of science, 99 00:02:49,826 --> 00:02:52,369 the world of discovering first 100 00:02:52,369 --> 00:02:54,241 article insights is a little 101 00:02:54,241 --> 00:02:55,273 different than the world 102 00:02:55,273 --> 00:02:56,322 of theology. 103 00:02:56,322 --> 00:02:57,962 In the world of theology, 104 00:02:57,962 --> 00:02:59,680 which we haven't got to yet, 105 00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:00,953 using that tool. 106 00:03:00,953 --> 00:03:02,233 But the theological 107 00:03:02,233 --> 00:03:03,433 tool that we use, 108 00:03:03,433 --> 00:03:05,393 we know God has given us things, 109 00:03:05,393 --> 00:03:06,608 and it doesn't change. 110 00:03:06,608 --> 00:03:08,314 So Jesus is our Savior, 111 00:03:08,314 --> 00:03:09,585 and that never changes. 112 00:03:09,585 --> 00:03:11,610 He will always be our savior. 113 00:03:11,610 --> 00:03:13,497 But when we're looking at the 114 00:03:13,497 --> 00:03:15,313 various disciplines that have 115 00:03:15,313 --> 00:03:17,249 popped up to help us understand 116 00:03:17,249 --> 00:03:19,040 God's good creation, 117 00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:20,297 sometimes they don't always 118 00:03:20,297 --> 00:03:20,945 get it right. 119 00:03:20,945 --> 00:03:22,273 One of the examples of this 120 00:03:22,273 --> 00:03:24,105 I think about is, 121 00:03:24,105 --> 00:03:25,865 for example, 122 00:03:25,865 --> 00:03:28,225 you'll see someone who says, 123 00:03:28,225 --> 00:03:28,873 well, 124 00:03:28,873 --> 00:03:30,298 you should drink a lot of wine, 125 00:03:30,298 --> 00:03:31,122 at least one glass 126 00:03:31,122 --> 00:03:32,081 of wine a day, 127 00:03:32,081 --> 00:03:32,761 because that's going 128 00:03:32,761 --> 00:03:34,399 to cure cancer, 129 00:03:34,399 --> 00:03:35,785 okay. 130 00:03:35,785 --> 00:03:37,833 And then you wait a few weeks 131 00:03:37,833 --> 00:03:38,657 or a month or a year, 132 00:03:38,657 --> 00:03:39,560 and someone else will come 133 00:03:39,560 --> 00:03:40,605 out and say, oh, no, 134 00:03:40,605 --> 00:03:41,661 we discovered that if 135 00:03:41,661 --> 00:03:42,317 you drink wine, 136 00:03:42,317 --> 00:03:43,462 actually will cause cancer. 137 00:03:43,462 --> 00:03:45,134 So stop drinking wine. 138 00:03:45,134 --> 00:03:47,853 So the world of science or the 139 00:03:47,853 --> 00:03:50,285 world of people who are 140 00:03:50,285 --> 00:03:52,772 looking at creation, 141 00:03:52,772 --> 00:03:55,065 it can change all the time 142 00:03:55,065 --> 00:03:56,865 and just realize that. 143 00:03:56,865 --> 00:03:58,345 And if you know that, 144 00:03:58,345 --> 00:04:00,249 how you read it or how you 145 00:04:00,249 --> 00:04:01,793 engage with it will actually 146 00:04:01,793 --> 00:04:02,921 be helpful to you. 147 00:04:02,921 --> 00:04:04,089 And there are a lot more 148 00:04:04,089 --> 00:04:05,417 disciplines out there than the 149 00:04:05,417 --> 00:04:06,900 ones that I've put here, 150 00:04:06,900 --> 00:04:08,397 but this will just give you a 151 00:04:08,397 --> 00:04:09,677 sense of some of them that are 152 00:04:09,677 --> 00:04:11,197 out there that you may want 153 00:04:11,197 --> 00:04:12,965 to explore. Alright, 154 00:04:12,965 --> 00:04:15,366 so within these disciplines, 155 00:04:15,366 --> 00:04:17,192 each one of these disciplines on 156 00:04:17,192 --> 00:04:19,634 their own uses particular maps 157 00:04:19,634 --> 00:04:21,505 to be able to understand 158 00:04:21,505 --> 00:04:23,226 whatever it is that they're 159 00:04:23,226 --> 00:04:25,034 researching or investigating. 160 00:04:25,034 --> 00:04:25,433 Well, 161 00:04:25,433 --> 00:04:26,121 let's look at the 162 00:04:26,121 --> 00:04:27,626 map of Nebraska. 163 00:04:27,626 --> 00:04:28,817 So to try to help you 164 00:04:28,817 --> 00:04:29,453 understand this, 165 00:04:29,453 --> 00:04:31,022 this is the map of Nebraska. 166 00:04:31,022 --> 00:04:33,134 And if I look at this map, 167 00:04:33,134 --> 00:04:35,061 this map is going to tell me 168 00:04:35,061 --> 00:04:37,206 where all the roads, highways, 169 00:04:37,206 --> 00:04:39,782 interstates are in Nebraska. 170 00:04:39,782 --> 00:04:41,637 It will also tell me with the 171 00:04:41,637 --> 00:04:43,577 color coding you can see behind, 172 00:04:43,577 --> 00:04:45,233 it will tell me where the 173 00:04:45,233 --> 00:04:47,066 counties are in Nebraska. 174 00:04:47,066 --> 00:04:48,784 So this can be a very 175 00:04:48,784 --> 00:04:50,106 informative map. 176 00:04:50,106 --> 00:04:51,496 But there are other maps of 177 00:04:51,496 --> 00:04:53,125 Nebraska. For example, 178 00:04:53,125 --> 00:04:55,365 this map of Nebraska tells me 179 00:04:55,365 --> 00:04:57,238 where the population centers 180 00:04:57,238 --> 00:04:58,502 are in Nebraska, 181 00:04:58,502 --> 00:05:00,686 where people live in Nebraska, 182 00:05:00,686 --> 00:05:01,341 alright. 183 00:05:01,341 --> 00:05:04,374 So it's still Nebraska, 184 00:05:04,374 --> 00:05:05,957 but it's a different map, 185 00:05:05,957 --> 00:05:07,299 and it's giving me different 186 00:05:07,299 --> 00:05:08,265 information. 187 00:05:08,265 --> 00:05:09,625 Now, 188 00:05:09,625 --> 00:05:12,986 this map is not a credible map. 189 00:05:12,986 --> 00:05:14,417 And if you want to pause the 190 00:05:14,417 --> 00:05:15,857 video to be able to have a 191 00:05:15,857 --> 00:05:16,873 discussion or figure out 192 00:05:16,873 --> 00:05:17,954 why it's not credible, 193 00:05:17,954 --> 00:05:18,689 you can do that. 194 00:05:18,689 --> 00:05:19,321 I'm not going to give 195 00:05:19,321 --> 00:05:20,375 you the answer, 196 00:05:20,375 --> 00:05:23,020 but this map is not credible. 197 00:05:23,020 --> 00:05:24,917 And the reason I do this is 198 00:05:24,917 --> 00:05:26,517 because I want to articulate to 199 00:05:26,517 --> 00:05:28,653 you that not every map you look 200 00:05:28,653 --> 00:05:30,794 at or every scientific article 201 00:05:30,794 --> 00:05:32,680 you read is credible. 202 00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:34,642 Some of it is just pure 203 00:05:34,642 --> 00:05:37,153 pseudoscience, alright. Now, 204 00:05:37,153 --> 00:05:38,657 in the theological world, 205 00:05:38,657 --> 00:05:39,929 we would say some things 206 00:05:39,929 --> 00:05:40,898 are theological, 207 00:05:40,898 --> 00:05:42,754 but other things are heresy. 208 00:05:42,754 --> 00:05:44,122 It's the same concept. 209 00:05:44,122 --> 00:05:45,689 We just kind of use different 210 00:05:45,689 --> 00:05:46,465 words for it. 211 00:05:46,465 --> 00:05:48,658 But this is not a credible map. 212 00:05:48,658 --> 00:05:50,089 And see if you can figure out 213 00:05:50,089 --> 00:05:51,866 why it's not a credible map. 214 00:05:51,866 --> 00:05:54,002 But if it was credible, 215 00:05:54,002 --> 00:05:55,817 it would be telling us about 216 00:05:55,817 --> 00:05:58,394 the population in Nebraska. 217 00:05:58,394 --> 00:05:59,990 Here's another map of Nebraska. 218 00:05:59,990 --> 00:06:01,642 This tells us where confirmed 219 00:06:01,642 --> 00:06:04,618 mountain lions are in Nebraska. 220 00:06:04,618 --> 00:06:05,161 Again, 221 00:06:05,161 --> 00:06:06,521 it's telling us something 222 00:06:06,521 --> 00:06:08,202 different than the other maps 223 00:06:08,202 --> 00:06:09,241 that I've shown you. 224 00:06:09,241 --> 00:06:11,009 And here they all are together. 225 00:06:11,009 --> 00:06:12,322 You have roads, 226 00:06:12,322 --> 00:06:14,418 you have mountain lions, 227 00:06:14,418 --> 00:06:15,522 you have population. 228 00:06:15,522 --> 00:06:17,849 And what this one shows us is 229 00:06:17,849 --> 00:06:19,138 where all the railroads 230 00:06:19,138 --> 00:06:20,418 are in Nebraska. 231 00:06:20,418 --> 00:06:21,097 So if you want to know where 232 00:06:21,097 --> 00:06:22,513 the railroads go now, 233 00:06:22,513 --> 00:06:23,385 it's interesting. 234 00:06:23,385 --> 00:06:25,077 You could probably compare the 235 00:06:25,077 --> 00:06:26,970 railroads to the population 236 00:06:26,970 --> 00:06:28,402 map and see that there's 237 00:06:28,402 --> 00:06:29,905 a correlation there. 238 00:06:29,905 --> 00:06:31,857 Or you could even lay on top of 239 00:06:31,857 --> 00:06:35,832 it mountain lion presence and 240 00:06:35,832 --> 00:06:37,727 see there's a correlation there, 241 00:06:37,727 --> 00:06:39,494 even the regular roads. 242 00:06:39,494 --> 00:06:40,509 In other words, 243 00:06:40,509 --> 00:06:42,037 even though there's lots of 244 00:06:42,037 --> 00:06:44,038 different maps of understanding 245 00:06:44,038 --> 00:06:46,614 within every secular 246 00:06:46,614 --> 00:06:48,413 professional discipline that 247 00:06:48,413 --> 00:06:52,175 addresses first article things, 248 00:06:52,175 --> 00:06:54,353 it's not that it's wrong 249 00:06:54,353 --> 00:06:55,490 to have different maps. 250 00:06:55,490 --> 00:06:57,153 I just want you to be aware that 251 00:06:57,153 --> 00:06:58,442 there are different maps 252 00:06:58,442 --> 00:06:59,714 of understanding. 253 00:06:59,714 --> 00:07:02,113 So that when you're reading the 254 00:07:02,113 --> 00:07:03,538 literature and you're reading 255 00:07:03,538 --> 00:07:05,229 articles and you're looking into 256 00:07:05,229 --> 00:07:06,662 this from a first article 257 00:07:06,662 --> 00:07:07,693 point of view, 258 00:07:07,693 --> 00:07:09,398 there are lots of different maps 259 00:07:09,398 --> 00:07:10,653 that can help us understand 260 00:07:10,653 --> 00:07:12,300 the same topic. 261 00:07:12,300 --> 00:07:13,973 Let me further help you 262 00:07:13,973 --> 00:07:14,917 understand this. 263 00:07:14,917 --> 00:07:16,712 So a map of understanding of 264 00:07:16,712 --> 00:07:18,945 alcoholism, alright. 265 00:07:18,945 --> 00:07:21,322 If you took a medical approach, 266 00:07:21,322 --> 00:07:22,609 you might say something 267 00:07:22,609 --> 00:07:23,697 like this well, 268 00:07:23,697 --> 00:07:24,873 the reason why people are 269 00:07:24,873 --> 00:07:26,562 alcoholic is because it's 270 00:07:26,562 --> 00:07:27,586 in their genes. 271 00:07:27,586 --> 00:07:28,973 It's passed down from one 272 00:07:28,973 --> 00:07:30,485 generation to another. 273 00:07:30,485 --> 00:07:33,445 But if you looked at a different 274 00:07:33,445 --> 00:07:35,942 map of understanding, 275 00:07:35,942 --> 00:07:36,629 for example, 276 00:07:36,629 --> 00:07:37,565 let's look at the social, 277 00:07:37,565 --> 00:07:38,302 cultural. 278 00:07:38,302 --> 00:07:39,773 They might say the reason why 279 00:07:39,773 --> 00:07:41,613 people become alcoholics is 280 00:07:41,613 --> 00:07:42,765 because the people they hang 281 00:07:42,765 --> 00:07:44,219 out with, alright. 282 00:07:44,219 --> 00:07:46,553 So they went off to college and 283 00:07:46,553 --> 00:07:48,498 they got into a drinking culture 284 00:07:48,498 --> 00:07:49,729 with a bunch of people, 285 00:07:49,729 --> 00:07:51,257 and that had nothing to 286 00:07:51,257 --> 00:07:52,018 do with their genes. 287 00:07:52,018 --> 00:07:53,041 It had to do with a 288 00:07:53,041 --> 00:07:54,190 drinking culture. 289 00:07:55,890 --> 00:07:57,502 And there's other maps besides 290 00:07:57,502 --> 00:07:58,861 the ones I have up here. 291 00:07:58,861 --> 00:07:59,757 But what I'm trying to 292 00:07:59,757 --> 00:08:02,077 articulate to you is you need to 293 00:08:02,077 --> 00:08:03,501 pay attention of the different 294 00:08:03,501 --> 00:08:05,068 maps of understanding 295 00:08:05,068 --> 00:08:05,897 people have, 296 00:08:05,897 --> 00:08:08,090 especially in the disciplines 297 00:08:08,090 --> 00:08:09,865 for how they think something 298 00:08:09,865 --> 00:08:11,537 exists. Now, 299 00:08:11,537 --> 00:08:14,449 my opinion is a lot of these 300 00:08:14,449 --> 00:08:16,681 maps can be true, 301 00:08:16,681 --> 00:08:18,826 and maybe they overlap. 302 00:08:18,826 --> 00:08:21,057 Maybe sometimes it is true that 303 00:08:21,057 --> 00:08:22,332 it's a genetic thing that 304 00:08:22,332 --> 00:08:23,654 people are alcoholics. 305 00:08:23,654 --> 00:08:24,573 But on the other hand, 306 00:08:24,573 --> 00:08:26,037 maybe it's also true that some 307 00:08:26,037 --> 00:08:27,742 people, it's not in their genes, 308 00:08:27,742 --> 00:08:29,373 but they got into the wrong 309 00:08:29,373 --> 00:08:31,377 group at college or something, 310 00:08:31,377 --> 00:08:32,896 they drank all the time, 311 00:08:32,896 --> 00:08:34,970 and they became an alcoholic. 312 00:08:34,970 --> 00:08:36,737 So understanding maps 313 00:08:36,737 --> 00:08:38,202 of understanding, 314 00:08:38,202 --> 00:08:39,737 these maps of understanding will 315 00:08:39,737 --> 00:08:40,913 actually help you then to 316 00:08:40,913 --> 00:08:43,977 determine which best approach is 317 00:08:43,977 --> 00:08:45,489 going to be helpful for you 318 00:08:45,489 --> 00:08:47,321 in attending to that issue 319 00:08:47,321 --> 00:08:48,442 opportunity and ministry 320 00:08:48,442 --> 00:08:49,313 question that you have 321 00:08:49,313 --> 00:08:51,176 established. Alright, well, 322 00:08:51,176 --> 00:08:52,880 let's talk about science. 323 00:08:52,880 --> 00:08:55,273 So a really good book on this, 324 00:08:55,273 --> 00:08:56,368 if you're looking for a book, 325 00:08:56,368 --> 00:08:57,442 is how to Think Straight 326 00:08:57,442 --> 00:08:58,960 About Psychology, 327 00:08:58,960 --> 00:09:00,095 in fact. 328 00:09:00,095 --> 00:09:01,656 You could probably change the 329 00:09:01,656 --> 00:09:03,753 title to how to Think Straight 330 00:09:03,753 --> 00:09:05,018 About Science. 331 00:09:05,018 --> 00:09:06,297 It just so happens he 332 00:09:06,297 --> 00:09:07,521 is a psychologist, 333 00:09:07,521 --> 00:09:09,706 so he is helping psychology 334 00:09:09,706 --> 00:09:12,065 people to understand how to 335 00:09:12,065 --> 00:09:14,441 think about science and research 336 00:09:14,441 --> 00:09:15,817 from a psychological point of 337 00:09:15,817 --> 00:09:17,058 view. But quite frankly, 338 00:09:17,058 --> 00:09:18,489 what he puts in there is true 339 00:09:18,489 --> 00:09:20,218 of all science everywhere. 340 00:09:20,218 --> 00:09:22,121 The distinction he makes between 341 00:09:22,121 --> 00:09:23,337 what a theory is and a 342 00:09:23,337 --> 00:09:25,665 hypothesis is, is important. 343 00:09:25,665 --> 00:09:29,416 So a theory in science is when 344 00:09:29,416 --> 00:09:30,641 well, let me back up. 345 00:09:30,641 --> 00:09:33,033 A hypothesis is kind of when we 346 00:09:33,033 --> 00:09:34,737 have a guess about something. 347 00:09:34,737 --> 00:09:36,778 So I have a hypothesis, 348 00:09:36,778 --> 00:09:37,489 I have a guess, 349 00:09:37,489 --> 00:09:38,701 and what I'm going to do is I'm 350 00:09:38,701 --> 00:09:39,853 going to use research to 351 00:09:39,853 --> 00:09:40,997 determine whether or not 352 00:09:40,997 --> 00:09:42,845 that's true or not. 353 00:09:42,845 --> 00:09:46,125 If multiple people test the same 354 00:09:46,125 --> 00:09:48,156 thing and determine, yeah, 355 00:09:48,156 --> 00:09:49,421 that is true, 356 00:09:49,421 --> 00:09:50,597 then eventually it 357 00:09:50,597 --> 00:09:52,099 becomes a theory. 358 00:09:52,099 --> 00:09:54,537 So a theory only happens when 359 00:09:54,537 --> 00:09:56,464 you have a variety of different 360 00:09:56,464 --> 00:09:58,113 research that has taken place to 361 00:09:58,113 --> 00:10:00,225 test a hypothesis and everyone 362 00:10:00,225 --> 00:10:01,313 agrees upon that, 363 00:10:01,313 --> 00:10:03,162 then it becomes a theory. 364 00:10:03,162 --> 00:10:04,697 So often you'll hear people say, 365 00:10:04,697 --> 00:10:06,097 I have a theory about this, 366 00:10:06,097 --> 00:10:06,937 what they really should 367 00:10:06,937 --> 00:10:07,473 be saying is, 368 00:10:07,473 --> 00:10:09,385 I have a guess about it. 369 00:10:09,385 --> 00:10:11,025 Because a theory is something 370 00:10:11,025 --> 00:10:12,937 much more has much more depth to 371 00:10:12,937 --> 00:10:15,006 it than what they're 372 00:10:15,006 --> 00:10:17,480 actually meaning. 373 00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:19,753 So what makes something have 374 00:10:19,753 --> 00:10:21,905 scientific merit? Well, 375 00:10:21,905 --> 00:10:22,848 these are the things 376 00:10:22,848 --> 00:10:24,258 that I have chosen. 377 00:10:24,258 --> 00:10:25,896 Are there more than this? 378 00:10:25,896 --> 00:10:26,793 Yes. 379 00:10:26,793 --> 00:10:29,174 And if you have had a doctoral 380 00:10:29,174 --> 00:10:32,916 course in research or you've had 381 00:10:32,916 --> 00:10:34,973 some advanced courses in 382 00:10:34,973 --> 00:10:36,149 science of some sort, 383 00:10:36,149 --> 00:10:37,541 whatever the discipline is, 384 00:10:37,541 --> 00:10:38,973 you could probably add more 385 00:10:38,973 --> 00:10:39,829 things to this list. 386 00:10:39,829 --> 00:10:40,921 And I understand that. 387 00:10:40,921 --> 00:10:43,841 But this is an introductory to 388 00:10:43,841 --> 00:10:45,289 understanding first 389 00:10:45,289 --> 00:10:46,505 article things. 390 00:10:46,505 --> 00:10:48,033 And so I've chosen the things 391 00:10:48,033 --> 00:10:49,825 that I think will be 392 00:10:49,825 --> 00:10:52,017 a good start for you. 393 00:10:52,017 --> 00:10:53,337 So these are the things that 394 00:10:53,337 --> 00:10:54,509 we're going to be talking about 395 00:10:54,509 --> 00:10:55,797 and we're going to go through. 396 00:10:55,797 --> 00:10:57,054 And from my perspective, 397 00:10:57,054 --> 00:10:59,901 if you're looking at a first 398 00:10:59,901 --> 00:11:01,470 article article, 399 00:11:01,470 --> 00:11:02,541 something that's dealing 400 00:11:02,541 --> 00:11:03,740 with science, 401 00:11:03,740 --> 00:11:05,437 you want to determine if it 402 00:11:05,437 --> 00:11:07,038 has scientific merit. 403 00:11:07,038 --> 00:11:08,293 If it does not have 404 00:11:08,293 --> 00:11:09,506 scientific merit, 405 00:11:09,506 --> 00:11:10,586 then it's something you don't 406 00:11:10,586 --> 00:11:11,920 want to waste your time on. 407 00:11:11,920 --> 00:11:13,033 And there's a lot of things 408 00:11:13,033 --> 00:11:14,233 out there that do not have 409 00:11:14,233 --> 00:11:16,321 scientific merit and are not 410 00:11:16,321 --> 00:11:18,729 valid and credible at all. 411 00:11:18,729 --> 00:11:20,153 You want to be reading things 412 00:11:20,153 --> 00:11:21,736 that have scientific merit. 413 00:11:21,736 --> 00:11:22,117 All right, 414 00:11:22,117 --> 00:11:23,357 so let's look at the first 415 00:11:23,357 --> 00:11:25,269 criterion. Now, 416 00:11:25,269 --> 00:11:26,492 this one can be a little bit 417 00:11:26,492 --> 00:11:27,957 difficult to kind of wrap your 418 00:11:27,957 --> 00:11:30,375 brain around out of all of them. 419 00:11:30,375 --> 00:11:31,529 That's why I started 420 00:11:31,529 --> 00:11:32,641 with it first. 421 00:11:32,641 --> 00:11:34,098 But the falsifiability 422 00:11:34,098 --> 00:11:35,599 criterion, 423 00:11:35,599 --> 00:11:36,944 what it says, 424 00:11:36,944 --> 00:11:40,353 is that the purpose is that for 425 00:11:40,353 --> 00:11:41,514 something to be scientific, 426 00:11:41,514 --> 00:11:42,481 it must be able to 427 00:11:42,481 --> 00:11:44,200 be proven false. 428 00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:45,793 And for some of us, 429 00:11:45,793 --> 00:11:47,689 that just doesn't seem right. 430 00:11:47,689 --> 00:11:49,569 But let me try to explain this. 431 00:11:49,569 --> 00:11:52,321 Let's say my hypothesis is this. 432 00:11:52,321 --> 00:11:55,936 My hypothesis is that there are 433 00:11:55,936 --> 00:11:57,913 little green men that live 434 00:11:57,913 --> 00:11:59,870 inside everyone's brains. 435 00:11:59,870 --> 00:12:01,777 And these little green men 436 00:12:01,777 --> 00:12:04,426 determine your psychological 437 00:12:04,426 --> 00:12:05,482 makeup. 438 00:12:05,482 --> 00:12:07,233 But these little green men are 439 00:12:07,233 --> 00:12:09,704 invisible. You can't see them. 440 00:12:09,704 --> 00:12:10,833 Okay? 441 00:12:10,833 --> 00:12:13,840 There's no way to scientifically 442 00:12:13,840 --> 00:12:16,433 disprove that. I'm saying. 443 00:12:16,433 --> 00:12:17,889 You just got to believe me. 444 00:12:17,889 --> 00:12:19,034 And in science, 445 00:12:19,034 --> 00:12:20,984 it doesn't work that way. 446 00:12:20,984 --> 00:12:22,218 In science, 447 00:12:22,218 --> 00:12:23,961 when you set something up, 448 00:12:23,961 --> 00:12:25,634 you have to have the ability 449 00:12:25,634 --> 00:12:28,897 to prove that it is false. 450 00:12:28,897 --> 00:12:31,626 If you can't prove it is false, 451 00:12:31,626 --> 00:12:33,833 then science can't do 452 00:12:33,833 --> 00:12:34,937 anything about it. 453 00:12:34,937 --> 00:12:36,642 And that's why sometimes there's 454 00:12:36,642 --> 00:12:38,233 a tension between science and 455 00:12:38,233 --> 00:12:40,430 theology, because theologically, 456 00:12:40,430 --> 00:12:42,533 we do say we believe in things 457 00:12:42,533 --> 00:12:44,813 that we can't get our hands on 458 00:12:44,813 --> 00:12:46,334 or we can't necessarily 459 00:12:46,334 --> 00:12:47,221 point to. 460 00:12:47,221 --> 00:12:48,757 And the scientific community has 461 00:12:48,757 --> 00:12:50,173 a difficult time with that. 462 00:12:50,173 --> 00:12:51,246 That's the reason why there's 463 00:12:51,246 --> 00:12:52,789 that tension there. Now, 464 00:12:52,789 --> 00:12:54,353 I don't think that tension means 465 00:12:54,353 --> 00:12:55,817 that we can't get along and we 466 00:12:55,817 --> 00:12:58,057 can't work with each other. 467 00:12:58,057 --> 00:12:59,721 There are people who say that. 468 00:12:59,721 --> 00:13:01,161 I'm not one of those people, 469 00:13:01,161 --> 00:13:02,536 but just realize that that's 470 00:13:02,536 --> 00:13:04,012 one of the tensions. Okay? 471 00:13:04,012 --> 00:13:06,589 So the falsifiability criteria 472 00:13:06,589 --> 00:13:10,485 in science is that 473 00:13:10,485 --> 00:13:13,300 it's scientific only if it 474 00:13:13,300 --> 00:13:14,930 can be proven false. 475 00:13:17,190 --> 00:13:18,896 So if you're working with a 476 00:13:18,896 --> 00:13:20,473 scientist or working with 477 00:13:20,473 --> 00:13:22,394 someone who likes science, 478 00:13:22,394 --> 00:13:23,857 one of the things if you want to 479 00:13:23,857 --> 00:13:25,370 participate in the conversation 480 00:13:25,370 --> 00:13:27,113 and look really intelligent and 481 00:13:27,113 --> 00:13:29,327 smart is you could say to them, 482 00:13:29,327 --> 00:13:32,860 so how can that be falsified? 483 00:13:32,860 --> 00:13:34,885 And see what they say. 484 00:13:34,885 --> 00:13:36,398 If they're a true scientist, 485 00:13:36,398 --> 00:13:37,222 they'll know what you're 486 00:13:37,222 --> 00:13:38,605 referring to and talking about, 487 00:13:38,605 --> 00:13:39,717 and they'll explain to 488 00:13:39,717 --> 00:13:41,569 you how their theory, 489 00:13:41,569 --> 00:13:42,898 how their hypothesis, 490 00:13:42,898 --> 00:13:44,433 how their whatever could 491 00:13:44,433 --> 00:13:46,240 be falsified. 492 00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:48,169 If they can't do that, 493 00:13:48,169 --> 00:13:49,242 then they probably don't 494 00:13:49,242 --> 00:13:50,202 understand the importance 495 00:13:50,202 --> 00:13:51,658 of scientific merit. 496 00:13:51,658 --> 00:13:53,097 There's so much more I could say 497 00:13:53,097 --> 00:13:54,817 about this, but for now, 498 00:13:54,817 --> 00:13:56,373 I think that's good enough. 499 00:13:56,373 --> 00:13:57,037 And if you want to know 500 00:13:57,037 --> 00:13:57,517 more about it, 501 00:13:57,517 --> 00:13:59,173 we can talk about it 502 00:13:59,173 --> 00:14:01,205 more in other ways. 503 00:14:01,205 --> 00:14:02,870 Let's talk about operational 504 00:14:02,870 --> 00:14:04,142 definitions. 505 00:14:04,142 --> 00:14:06,396 When you're reading any of the 506 00:14:06,396 --> 00:14:07,445 literature that you're 507 00:14:07,445 --> 00:14:08,665 going to read, 508 00:14:08,665 --> 00:14:10,873 you want to pay attention to how 509 00:14:10,873 --> 00:14:13,249 they're defining things. So, 510 00:14:13,249 --> 00:14:13,729 for example, 511 00:14:13,729 --> 00:14:14,778 if I'm reading an article 512 00:14:14,778 --> 00:14:15,746 on depression, 513 00:14:15,746 --> 00:14:16,953 I'm going to be interested in 514 00:14:16,953 --> 00:14:18,982 how they define depression. 515 00:14:18,982 --> 00:14:21,533 Or if someone wants to say, oh, 516 00:14:21,533 --> 00:14:23,053 this was successful, well, 517 00:14:23,053 --> 00:14:24,326 what's their definition 518 00:14:24,326 --> 00:14:25,533 of success? 519 00:14:25,533 --> 00:14:27,373 Because their definition of 520 00:14:27,373 --> 00:14:28,789 success may be different from 521 00:14:28,789 --> 00:14:30,565 my definition of success. 522 00:14:30,565 --> 00:14:32,145 So a way to illustrate this, 523 00:14:32,145 --> 00:14:34,017 I took a screenshot of 524 00:14:34,017 --> 00:14:36,465 Dairy Queen's app, 525 00:14:36,465 --> 00:14:39,082 and I'm sure we've 526 00:14:39,082 --> 00:14:39,937 all done this. 527 00:14:39,937 --> 00:14:40,866 Maybe it's not Dairy 528 00:14:40,866 --> 00:14:41,713 Queen where you go. 529 00:14:41,713 --> 00:14:43,217 Maybe you go somewhere else. 530 00:14:43,217 --> 00:14:44,578 Ted Drew's is the popular 531 00:14:44,578 --> 00:14:45,537 one around here, 532 00:14:45,537 --> 00:14:46,593 but usually you'll hear 533 00:14:46,593 --> 00:14:47,841 people say this, 534 00:14:47,841 --> 00:14:50,033 let's go to Dairy Queen and 535 00:14:50,033 --> 00:14:52,120 get some ice cream. 536 00:14:52,120 --> 00:14:54,697 But if you notice in all 537 00:14:54,697 --> 00:14:56,272 of Dairy Queen stuff, 538 00:14:56,272 --> 00:14:57,394 their publications, 539 00:14:57,394 --> 00:14:59,281 their advertisements, their app, 540 00:14:59,281 --> 00:15:00,055 if you look at their. 541 00:15:00,055 --> 00:15:01,080 Menu. 542 00:15:01,080 --> 00:15:02,658 It doesn't say ice 543 00:15:02,658 --> 00:15:04,760 cream anywhere. 544 00:15:04,760 --> 00:15:07,873 So why is that? 545 00:15:07,873 --> 00:15:09,425 Why are they not using 546 00:15:09,425 --> 00:15:11,258 the label ice cream? 547 00:15:11,258 --> 00:15:12,433 Why are they using something 548 00:15:12,433 --> 00:15:13,368 else? So you see here, 549 00:15:13,368 --> 00:15:14,634 this is a vanilla cone, 550 00:15:14,634 --> 00:15:15,882 chocolate dip cone, 551 00:15:15,882 --> 00:15:18,200 fruity blast, dip cone, 552 00:15:18,200 --> 00:15:19,890 no ice cream. 553 00:15:19,890 --> 00:15:22,280 And if I have other screenshots 554 00:15:22,280 --> 00:15:23,793 of the other things that they 555 00:15:23,793 --> 00:15:25,889 sell and no where does it refer 556 00:15:25,889 --> 00:15:27,273 to it? Ice cream. Well, 557 00:15:27,273 --> 00:15:29,833 this is why is because the Food 558 00:15:29,833 --> 00:15:31,809 and Drug Administration has 559 00:15:31,809 --> 00:15:34,361 defined ice cream in such a way 560 00:15:34,361 --> 00:15:36,378 that Dairy Queen can't label 561 00:15:36,378 --> 00:15:38,002 it as ice cream. 562 00:15:38,002 --> 00:15:39,293 And they start off and say, 563 00:15:39,293 --> 00:15:40,757 typically our soft serve does 564 00:15:40,757 --> 00:15:42,069 not qualify to be called 565 00:15:42,069 --> 00:15:43,246 ice cream. 566 00:15:43,246 --> 00:15:45,589 So this works the same way with 567 00:15:45,589 --> 00:15:48,845 research and science is maybe 568 00:15:48,845 --> 00:15:50,093 the reason why they're not 569 00:15:50,093 --> 00:15:52,499 calling it something is because 570 00:15:52,499 --> 00:15:54,554 someone else has specifically 571 00:15:54,554 --> 00:15:56,537 defined it in a way that they 572 00:15:56,537 --> 00:15:58,442 can't use that label. 573 00:15:58,442 --> 00:15:59,737 And these are things you 574 00:15:59,737 --> 00:16:01,257 probably didn't think about. 575 00:16:01,257 --> 00:16:01,656 Now, 576 00:16:01,656 --> 00:16:02,481 the next time you want 577 00:16:02,481 --> 00:16:03,594 to go get ice cream, 578 00:16:03,594 --> 00:16:04,978 you're going to stop and, huh, 579 00:16:04,978 --> 00:16:06,041 if we're going to Dairy Queen, 580 00:16:06,041 --> 00:16:06,777 I guess we can't call 581 00:16:06,777 --> 00:16:07,726 it ice cream. 582 00:16:07,726 --> 00:16:09,102 You can call it soft serve. 583 00:16:09,102 --> 00:16:09,517 You can say, 584 00:16:09,517 --> 00:16:11,260 I'm just going to get a cone. 585 00:16:11,260 --> 00:16:12,733 But technically, 586 00:16:12,733 --> 00:16:14,117 you can't call it that way. 587 00:16:14,117 --> 00:16:16,140 And when we do science, 588 00:16:16,140 --> 00:16:18,780 science is very technical. 589 00:16:18,780 --> 00:16:20,905 So how they define their terms 590 00:16:20,905 --> 00:16:22,449 makes a big difference because 591 00:16:22,449 --> 00:16:23,697 how they define it makes a big 592 00:16:23,697 --> 00:16:24,577 difference of how they're going 593 00:16:24,577 --> 00:16:26,416 to measure it and the 594 00:16:26,416 --> 00:16:27,673 conclusions that they make about 595 00:16:27,673 --> 00:16:28,873 it. So at this point, 596 00:16:28,873 --> 00:16:30,381 I just want you to be aware when 597 00:16:30,381 --> 00:16:32,165 you're reading some of these 598 00:16:32,165 --> 00:16:33,853 scientific articles and 599 00:16:33,853 --> 00:16:34,549 things like this, 600 00:16:34,549 --> 00:16:35,749 non theological things, 601 00:16:35,749 --> 00:16:36,621 pay attention to how 602 00:16:36,621 --> 00:16:38,085 they define things. 603 00:16:38,085 --> 00:16:38,893 Alright, 604 00:16:38,893 --> 00:16:40,465 validity is a pretty big word. 605 00:16:40,465 --> 00:16:41,817 It's the extent to which the 606 00:16:41,817 --> 00:16:43,242 instrument measures what intends 607 00:16:43,242 --> 00:16:44,753 to measure. Alright, 608 00:16:44,753 --> 00:16:46,545 so let's say 609 00:16:46,545 --> 00:16:50,193 I wanted to measure how much 610 00:16:50,193 --> 00:16:52,745 alcohol is in your system. 611 00:16:52,745 --> 00:16:53,257 Well, 612 00:16:53,257 --> 00:16:55,986 if I put you on this scale, 613 00:16:55,986 --> 00:16:57,277 this scale is going to give 614 00:16:57,277 --> 00:16:58,366 me a measurement, 615 00:16:58,366 --> 00:16:59,573 but it's not going to give me 616 00:16:59,573 --> 00:17:00,829 the right measurement because 617 00:17:00,829 --> 00:17:02,990 that's not the right instrument 618 00:17:02,990 --> 00:17:04,693 in order to be able to 619 00:17:04,693 --> 00:17:06,302 understand how much alcohol 620 00:17:06,302 --> 00:17:07,461 is in your system. 621 00:17:07,461 --> 00:17:08,453 So when you're looking 622 00:17:08,453 --> 00:17:09,134 at literature, 623 00:17:09,134 --> 00:17:10,225 you want to pay attention. 624 00:17:10,225 --> 00:17:11,489 Are they using the right 625 00:17:11,489 --> 00:17:13,418 measurement in order to measure 626 00:17:13,418 --> 00:17:14,482 the thing they say they're 627 00:17:14,482 --> 00:17:15,362 measuring? 628 00:17:15,362 --> 00:17:16,921 Sometimes they get it wrong and 629 00:17:16,921 --> 00:17:17,561 they're not using the 630 00:17:17,561 --> 00:17:18,456 right measurement. 631 00:17:18,456 --> 00:17:21,213 Earlier I showed you we had 632 00:17:21,213 --> 00:17:24,030 binoculars and we had telescope 633 00:17:24,030 --> 00:17:25,950 and we had a microscope. 634 00:17:25,950 --> 00:17:26,197 Well, 635 00:17:26,197 --> 00:17:28,012 if you wanted to look at the 636 00:17:28,012 --> 00:17:29,918 stars in the sky and you're 637 00:17:29,918 --> 00:17:31,222 using a microscope, 638 00:17:31,222 --> 00:17:32,197 you'd be using the 639 00:17:32,197 --> 00:17:33,282 wrong instrument. 640 00:17:33,282 --> 00:17:34,929 So when you think of validity, 641 00:17:34,929 --> 00:17:36,569 think in terms of what 642 00:17:36,569 --> 00:17:38,833 instrument are they using and 643 00:17:38,833 --> 00:17:40,201 are they using the correct 644 00:17:40,201 --> 00:17:41,393 instrument to help them 645 00:17:41,393 --> 00:17:43,097 understand what's going on? 646 00:17:43,097 --> 00:17:45,418 Another big term is reliability. 647 00:17:45,418 --> 00:17:47,690 Reliability is the consistency 648 00:17:47,690 --> 00:17:49,514 with which a measuring 649 00:17:49,514 --> 00:17:50,673 instrument yields a certain 650 00:17:50,673 --> 00:17:52,537 consistent result when the 651 00:17:52,537 --> 00:17:53,938 entity being measured hasn't 652 00:17:53,938 --> 00:17:54,973 changed. Alright, 653 00:17:54,973 --> 00:17:56,496 say I have ten people, 654 00:17:56,496 --> 00:17:59,217 and I have each one of those 655 00:17:59,217 --> 00:17:59,975 ten people come 656 00:17:59,975 --> 00:18:02,194 up and stand on this scale, 657 00:18:02,194 --> 00:18:04,089 and I want to know how 658 00:18:04,089 --> 00:18:05,338 much they weigh. 659 00:18:05,338 --> 00:18:07,161 So I'm using the right 660 00:18:07,161 --> 00:18:08,353 instrument, alright, 661 00:18:08,353 --> 00:18:09,906 which makes it valid. 662 00:18:09,906 --> 00:18:11,882 So they all come up and I weigh 663 00:18:11,882 --> 00:18:15,002 them. The first participant, 664 00:18:15,002 --> 00:18:16,697 the scale tells me he 665 00:18:16,697 --> 00:18:18,306 weighs 100 pounds. 666 00:18:18,306 --> 00:18:20,113 After all ten of them have gone 667 00:18:20,113 --> 00:18:21,425 through, they come back again. 668 00:18:21,425 --> 00:18:22,418 The first participant 669 00:18:22,418 --> 00:18:23,490 steps on the scale, 670 00:18:23,490 --> 00:18:24,842 and now it says he weighs 671 00:18:24,842 --> 00:18:27,705 170 pounds. Well, 672 00:18:27,705 --> 00:18:28,817 although I'm using the 673 00:18:28,817 --> 00:18:29,938 right instrument, 674 00:18:29,938 --> 00:18:32,313 the instrument is not reliable, 675 00:18:32,313 --> 00:18:34,960 because it's giving me a 676 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:37,697 different result every time 677 00:18:37,697 --> 00:18:38,769 I put someone on it, 678 00:18:38,769 --> 00:18:39,537 especially if it's the 679 00:18:39,537 --> 00:18:41,121 same person. Now, 680 00:18:41,121 --> 00:18:42,837 if I would have him stand on the 681 00:18:42,837 --> 00:18:44,581 scale today, and he weighed, 682 00:18:44,581 --> 00:18:46,494 let's say, 170 pounds, 683 00:18:46,494 --> 00:18:47,860 and I weighed it a month, 684 00:18:47,860 --> 00:18:48,893 and I weighed him again, 685 00:18:48,893 --> 00:18:50,277 and he weighed 100 pounds, well, 686 00:18:50,277 --> 00:18:51,565 that's different because 687 00:18:51,565 --> 00:18:52,982 something happened that caused 688 00:18:52,982 --> 00:18:53,782 him to lose weight. 689 00:18:53,782 --> 00:18:55,598 And I'm going to investigate 690 00:18:55,598 --> 00:18:57,057 that. Look, research that, 691 00:18:57,057 --> 00:18:58,217 but if you're doing it like 692 00:18:58,217 --> 00:18:59,241 within five minutes, 693 00:18:59,241 --> 00:19:01,442 no one loses 70 pounds 694 00:19:01,442 --> 00:19:02,976 within five minutes. 695 00:19:02,976 --> 00:19:04,133 So something is wrong 696 00:19:04,133 --> 00:19:05,142 with the instrument. 697 00:19:05,142 --> 00:19:06,717 So pay attention to the 698 00:19:06,717 --> 00:19:08,229 instruments that they're using 699 00:19:08,229 --> 00:19:09,413 and whether or not those 700 00:19:09,413 --> 00:19:11,540 instruments are reliable. 701 00:19:11,540 --> 00:19:13,598 Sampling criteria. 702 00:19:13,598 --> 00:19:15,446 So you want to pay attention. 703 00:19:15,446 --> 00:19:17,745 Well, when we do research, 704 00:19:17,745 --> 00:19:19,673 we never do research on the 705 00:19:19,673 --> 00:19:21,545 entire population of the United 706 00:19:21,545 --> 00:19:23,001 States or the world. 707 00:19:23,001 --> 00:19:25,297 That's impossible to do. I mean, 708 00:19:25,297 --> 00:19:26,313 they try doing that, 709 00:19:26,313 --> 00:19:26,824 for example, 710 00:19:26,824 --> 00:19:27,874 when there's a census, 711 00:19:27,874 --> 00:19:28,990 but there's limitations, 712 00:19:28,990 --> 00:19:29,917 given that. 713 00:19:29,917 --> 00:19:32,357 So researchers often will have 714 00:19:32,357 --> 00:19:33,949 to get a sample together. 715 00:19:33,949 --> 00:19:35,109 So they'll get 100 716 00:19:35,109 --> 00:19:36,085 people together, 717 00:19:36,085 --> 00:19:38,086 and based upon that sample, 718 00:19:38,086 --> 00:19:39,734 then they'll make conclusions 719 00:19:39,734 --> 00:19:41,745 based upon the data they get. 720 00:19:41,745 --> 00:19:43,378 Pay attention when you're 721 00:19:43,378 --> 00:19:45,473 looking at the literature as to 722 00:19:45,473 --> 00:19:47,337 the sampling that they're using. 723 00:19:47,337 --> 00:19:49,225 So, for example, 724 00:19:49,225 --> 00:19:51,489 if I wanted to understand 725 00:19:51,489 --> 00:19:53,657 people's opinions but let's just 726 00:19:53,657 --> 00:19:54,829 do this if I want to understand 727 00:19:54,829 --> 00:19:56,598 people's opinions about worship, 728 00:19:56,598 --> 00:19:57,373 let's say, 729 00:19:57,373 --> 00:20:00,453 and the only people I had as my 730 00:20:00,453 --> 00:20:02,397 sampling size were people who 731 00:20:02,397 --> 00:20:05,310 are 50 years of age or older. 732 00:20:05,310 --> 00:20:06,541 I'd have some questions 733 00:20:06,541 --> 00:20:07,443 about that, 734 00:20:07,443 --> 00:20:09,456 because that's just telling me a 735 00:20:09,456 --> 00:20:11,297 certain age group of what they 736 00:20:11,297 --> 00:20:12,800 think about worship. 737 00:20:12,800 --> 00:20:15,456 But I would need to know what 738 00:20:15,456 --> 00:20:16,553 the 20 year olds think, 739 00:20:16,553 --> 00:20:17,578 or the teenagers, 740 00:20:17,578 --> 00:20:18,665 thirty's and forty's. 741 00:20:18,665 --> 00:20:21,253 So a good sampling size for that 742 00:20:21,253 --> 00:20:22,837 would mean that I would want a 743 00:20:22,837 --> 00:20:25,261 variety of different ages and a 744 00:20:25,261 --> 00:20:27,213 variety of different genders as 745 00:20:27,213 --> 00:20:29,380 well. So pay attention to age, 746 00:20:29,380 --> 00:20:30,838 pay attention to gender, 747 00:20:30,838 --> 00:20:32,173 pay attention to a lot of those 748 00:20:32,173 --> 00:20:33,041 things when you look at 749 00:20:33,041 --> 00:20:34,201 their sampling size, 750 00:20:34,201 --> 00:20:34,961 because that could be 751 00:20:34,961 --> 00:20:36,264 part of the problem. 752 00:20:36,264 --> 00:20:37,553 The other thing that is 753 00:20:37,553 --> 00:20:39,049 important when it comes to 754 00:20:39,049 --> 00:20:41,673 looking at research articles is 755 00:20:41,673 --> 00:20:42,729 have they been able 756 00:20:42,729 --> 00:20:44,097 to replicate it? 757 00:20:44,097 --> 00:20:46,537 Has anyone else replicated it? 758 00:20:46,537 --> 00:20:48,409 And have they given you remember 759 00:20:48,409 --> 00:20:50,194 earlier I talked about method 760 00:20:50,194 --> 00:20:51,785 when it comes to research, 761 00:20:51,785 --> 00:20:53,442 we use methods. 762 00:20:53,442 --> 00:20:55,353 We don't use frameworks. Well, 763 00:20:55,353 --> 00:20:56,225 we could, 764 00:20:56,225 --> 00:20:58,097 but the actual research is done 765 00:20:58,097 --> 00:20:59,770 with the method. All right. 766 00:20:59,770 --> 00:21:01,913 That we're going to be using. 767 00:21:01,913 --> 00:21:03,681 So the method is important. 768 00:21:03,681 --> 00:21:04,922 What is the method? 769 00:21:04,922 --> 00:21:06,033 And have they told us 770 00:21:06,033 --> 00:21:06,857 what the method is? 771 00:21:06,857 --> 00:21:08,721 So I could go and do that same I 772 00:21:08,721 --> 00:21:10,137 could take that recipe of that 773 00:21:10,137 --> 00:21:12,257 research they did, do it myself, 774 00:21:12,257 --> 00:21:13,393 and see if I come to 775 00:21:13,393 --> 00:21:15,122 the same results. 776 00:21:15,122 --> 00:21:16,913 If they're not telling you the 777 00:21:16,913 --> 00:21:20,058 method they used in the article 778 00:21:20,058 --> 00:21:21,002 and they're keeping 779 00:21:21,002 --> 00:21:22,112 it to themselves, 780 00:21:22,112 --> 00:21:23,345 then that's probably 781 00:21:23,345 --> 00:21:24,313 pseudoscience. 782 00:21:24,313 --> 00:21:25,329 I'll give you an example 783 00:21:25,329 --> 00:21:25,976 of this. 784 00:21:25,976 --> 00:21:26,962 There's these dating 785 00:21:26,962 --> 00:21:28,033 apps out there. 786 00:21:28,033 --> 00:21:29,857 These dating apps claim that 787 00:21:29,857 --> 00:21:30,914 they have the greatest 788 00:21:30,914 --> 00:21:32,713 algorithms and that they can 789 00:21:32,713 --> 00:21:33,649 match people better 790 00:21:33,649 --> 00:21:35,112 than anyone else. 791 00:21:35,112 --> 00:21:36,897 But they never tell us the 792 00:21:36,897 --> 00:21:38,976 method that they use to do that. 793 00:21:38,976 --> 00:21:40,657 And they say the reason they 794 00:21:40,657 --> 00:21:41,537 don't want to share it is 795 00:21:41,537 --> 00:21:42,333 because they don't want other 796 00:21:42,333 --> 00:21:43,373 people to take it and 797 00:21:43,373 --> 00:21:44,525 use it themselves. 798 00:21:44,525 --> 00:21:46,197 But because they don't show 799 00:21:46,197 --> 00:21:47,460 me the method they use, 800 00:21:47,460 --> 00:21:49,557 I'm suspicious of that. I mean, 801 00:21:49,557 --> 00:21:50,677 they could just simply be just 802 00:21:50,677 --> 00:21:51,581 flipping a coin in 803 00:21:51,581 --> 00:21:52,284 the back room. 804 00:21:52,284 --> 00:21:52,997 We don't know what 805 00:21:52,997 --> 00:21:53,764 they're doing. 806 00:21:53,764 --> 00:21:56,320 So if I can't see the method, 807 00:21:56,320 --> 00:21:58,217 I can't be critical of the 808 00:21:58,217 --> 00:21:59,873 method in a way that helps me 809 00:21:59,873 --> 00:22:00,753 understand what they're doing. 810 00:22:00,753 --> 00:22:02,202 So think in terms of when you're 811 00:22:02,202 --> 00:22:03,510 looking at these articles, 812 00:22:03,510 --> 00:22:04,862 are they telling you the method 813 00:22:04,862 --> 00:22:06,045 that they're using? 814 00:22:06,045 --> 00:22:08,188 The other thing has to do with 815 00:22:08,188 --> 00:22:09,700 breaking news stuff. 816 00:22:11,590 --> 00:22:13,437 Often news groups will do 817 00:22:13,437 --> 00:22:14,789 this breaking news. 818 00:22:14,789 --> 00:22:16,073 This thing is going to help 819 00:22:16,073 --> 00:22:17,409 you out. Right? Well, 820 00:22:17,409 --> 00:22:18,241 I'm not interested 821 00:22:18,241 --> 00:22:19,337 in breaking news. 822 00:22:19,337 --> 00:22:21,945 Breaking news often is pop 823 00:22:21,945 --> 00:22:24,842 psychology or pop science, 824 00:22:24,842 --> 00:22:26,898 and it usually is not helpful. 825 00:22:26,898 --> 00:22:27,455 Instead, 826 00:22:27,455 --> 00:22:28,221 what we're interested in 827 00:22:28,221 --> 00:22:30,094 is converging evidence. 828 00:22:30,094 --> 00:22:31,805 In other words, 829 00:22:31,805 --> 00:22:34,741 let's say there were 50 830 00:22:34,741 --> 00:22:36,742 scientists and they weren't 831 00:22:36,742 --> 00:22:38,645 connected to each other at all. 832 00:22:38,645 --> 00:22:40,990 They all used the same method, 833 00:22:40,990 --> 00:22:42,301 and they all came to the 834 00:22:42,301 --> 00:22:43,937 same conclusion. Ah, 835 00:22:43,937 --> 00:22:45,618 I have some converging evidence 836 00:22:45,618 --> 00:22:46,737 that tells me, yes, 837 00:22:46,737 --> 00:22:48,266 if I take this pill, 838 00:22:48,266 --> 00:22:49,688 it will cure me of whatever 839 00:22:49,688 --> 00:22:51,601 disease I have. That's great. 840 00:22:51,601 --> 00:22:53,437 But if only one group of 841 00:22:53,437 --> 00:22:56,445 scientists or only a couple 842 00:22:56,445 --> 00:22:58,406 come to some conclusions, 843 00:22:58,406 --> 00:22:59,677 I'm probably not going to get 844 00:22:59,677 --> 00:23:01,501 too excited about it because 845 00:23:01,501 --> 00:23:02,885 they haven't done enough 846 00:23:02,885 --> 00:23:04,702 research to get converging 847 00:23:04,702 --> 00:23:06,529 evidence. Alright, 848 00:23:06,529 --> 00:23:08,793 so you need to be looking for 849 00:23:08,793 --> 00:23:11,809 some academic articles that help 850 00:23:11,809 --> 00:23:13,593 you to be able to attend to the 851 00:23:13,593 --> 00:23:15,217 issue or the opportunity that 852 00:23:15,217 --> 00:23:17,040 you have identified. 853 00:23:17,040 --> 00:23:18,817 If you're part of the 854 00:23:18,817 --> 00:23:19,925 seminary community, 855 00:23:19,925 --> 00:23:21,645 you have so much access 856 00:23:21,645 --> 00:23:22,813 to the library, 857 00:23:22,813 --> 00:23:23,998 and hopefully somewhere 858 00:23:23,998 --> 00:23:24,797 along the line, 859 00:23:24,797 --> 00:23:26,117 you've already been taught how 860 00:23:26,117 --> 00:23:28,500 to use the library resources. 861 00:23:28,500 --> 00:23:30,125 If you're watching this video 862 00:23:30,125 --> 00:23:31,645 and you don't have total access 863 00:23:31,645 --> 00:23:32,786 to the library because you're 864 00:23:32,786 --> 00:23:34,425 not a student here, 865 00:23:34,425 --> 00:23:36,985 realize other options you have. 866 00:23:36,985 --> 00:23:39,633 Google Scholar is a great way to 867 00:23:39,633 --> 00:23:41,402 be able to look for academic 868 00:23:41,402 --> 00:23:43,225 articles and get information. 869 00:23:43,225 --> 00:23:45,594 You just google Google Scholar 870 00:23:45,594 --> 00:23:47,033 and it will come up. 871 00:23:47,033 --> 00:23:49,490 If you have a local university, 872 00:23:49,490 --> 00:23:50,450 state university, 873 00:23:50,450 --> 00:23:52,121 many times they will allow you 874 00:23:52,121 --> 00:23:55,481 to check out items or to look in 875 00:23:55,481 --> 00:23:56,953 their stacks or to 876 00:23:56,953 --> 00:23:57,784 use their system. 877 00:23:57,784 --> 00:23:59,529 They have their library system. 878 00:23:59,529 --> 00:24:00,015 Or if. 879 00:24:00,015 --> 00:24:00,809 If you have a local 880 00:24:00,809 --> 00:24:01,594 public library, 881 00:24:01,594 --> 00:24:03,233 many times librarians are very 882 00:24:03,233 --> 00:24:05,593 excited to be able to help you 883 00:24:05,593 --> 00:24:06,857 to find the thing that 884 00:24:06,857 --> 00:24:07,553 you're looking for. 885 00:24:07,553 --> 00:24:08,880 You just got to ask, 886 00:24:10,770 --> 00:24:11,577 as you're looking for 887 00:24:11,577 --> 00:24:12,906 academic articles, 888 00:24:12,906 --> 00:24:15,057 make sure and explore all those 889 00:24:15,057 --> 00:24:16,440 avenues that are available 890 00:24:16,440 --> 00:24:17,873 to you. Alright, 891 00:24:17,873 --> 00:24:19,784 so to sum things up then, 892 00:24:19,784 --> 00:24:23,153 so the exploratory tool of 893 00:24:23,153 --> 00:24:24,089 engaging your first 894 00:24:24,089 --> 00:24:25,118 article insight, 895 00:24:25,118 --> 00:24:26,496 it's going to help us 896 00:24:26,496 --> 00:24:27,545 answer the question, 897 00:24:27,545 --> 00:24:28,985 what's God's design 898 00:24:28,985 --> 00:24:30,130 for creation? 899 00:24:30,130 --> 00:24:32,242 We have these particular skills 900 00:24:32,242 --> 00:24:32,699 that are going to be 901 00:24:32,699 --> 00:24:33,737 helpful to us, 902 00:24:33,737 --> 00:24:35,146 and these are the components 903 00:24:35,146 --> 00:24:35,777 that we're going to 904 00:24:35,777 --> 00:24:37,849 be using as well. 905 00:24:37,849 --> 00:24:39,192 We're going to distinguish 906 00:24:39,192 --> 00:24:40,646 science from pseudoscience. 907 00:24:40,646 --> 00:24:42,022 We're going to analyze various 908 00:24:42,022 --> 00:24:43,422 maps of understanding. 909 00:24:43,422 --> 00:24:44,517 We're going to identify the 910 00:24:44,517 --> 00:24:46,166 limitations of first article, 911 00:24:46,166 --> 00:24:47,213 understand that they have 912 00:24:47,213 --> 00:24:49,405 limitations, and finally, 913 00:24:49,405 --> 00:24:50,347 you're going to determine how 914 00:24:50,347 --> 00:24:51,641 these first article insights 915 00:24:51,641 --> 00:24:53,017 contribute to addressing the 916 00:24:53,017 --> 00:24:55,257 issue and or opportunity that 917 00:24:55,257 --> 00:24:56,784 you've identified and also 918 00:24:56,784 --> 00:24:58,665 answering the ministry question. 919 00:24:58,665 --> 00:24:59,505 Alright, 920 00:24:59,505 --> 00:25:01,458 so these exploratory tools 921 00:25:01,458 --> 00:25:02,506 are very helpful. 922 00:25:02,506 --> 00:25:03,497 This exploratory tool, 923 00:25:03,497 --> 00:25:03,897 I should say, 924 00:25:03,897 --> 00:25:05,081 is very helpful then, 925 00:25:05,081 --> 00:25:07,713 to be able to help you to look 926 00:25:07,713 --> 00:25:09,497 at God's creation and look 927 00:25:09,497 --> 00:25:11,737 at what science and other 928 00:25:11,737 --> 00:25:12,898 disciplines in the secular 929 00:25:12,898 --> 00:25:14,025 world are doing. 930 00:25:14,025 --> 00:25:15,697 So our next video then what 931 00:25:15,697 --> 00:25:17,617 we're going to do is we're going 932 00:25:17,617 --> 00:25:19,714 to be discerning theological 933 00:25:19,714 --> 00:25:20,470 wisdom.