Date of Award
5-1-1947
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Divinity (B.Div)
Department
Exegetical Theology
First Advisor
Martin Franzmann
Scripture References in this Resource (separated by semi-colons)
Mark 6:45-8:30; Mark 3:13-19; Luke 6:13-16; Matthew 20:29-34; Matthew 14:24-33; Mark 6:47-53; Acts 2:14-36; Acts 3:12-26; 1 Corinthians 15:1-8; 1 Corinthians 11:23; Luke 1:2; Matthew 2:1-12; Matthew 10:16; Matthew 6:9f; Matthew 11:29; Matthew 7:6; Matthew 28:19; Acts 7:38; Romans 2:2; Hebrews 5:12; 1 Peter 4:11;
Abstract
One of' the perplexing problems in the field of New Testament Introduction is the relationship of the first three Gospels to each other. A careful reading of these Gospels rcvea1s that they are much alike and seem to have much in common. There are many similar or strikingly similar events in all three. Then, too, there are clearcut differences. The Evangelists who wrote these Gospels tell us nothing concerning how their writings were related to each other. Luke alone says something about how his Gospel came to be written. Apostolic testimony on these three Gospels is something unknown to us.
Recommended Citation
Krentz, Arno E., "The Position of Present Scholarship with Regard to the Hypothetical Document Designated as Logia or "Q"" (1947). Bachelor of Divinity. 245.
https://scholar.csl.edu/bdiv/245
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
